The Official Site of the

New Jersey Senate Republicans

Senate Republicans Urge Murphy Not to Cut School Aid

Please Share:

Bookmark and Share

Gov. Murphy’s Proposed Budget Cuts Funding to Nearly 200 School Districts

The Republican members of the Senate Budget & Appropriations Committee urged Governor Phil Murphy not to cut school aid in his proposed budget for districts that are already struggling with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Republican senators urged Gov. Phil Murphy not to cut aid this year for school districts grappling with virtual education, technology costs, and planning for a safe return to classrooms. (Pixabay)

In a letter to Governor Murphy today (click here for PDF), the senators said, “we believe that while schools are grappling with virtual education, technology costs, and planning for a safe return to our classrooms, no school should have its aid cut.”

Under the governor’s proposed budget, approximately one-third of New Jersey’s school districts would have to contend with budget cuts despite an overall $600 million increase in proposed State spending on school aid.

The legislators, Senator Steven Oroho (R-24), Senator Declan O’Scanlon (R-13), Senator Michael Testa (R-1), and Senator Sam Thompson (R-12), said they would propose changes to the budget and identify savings to prevent nearly 200 school districts from facing cuts.

Additionally, they noted that the proposed 11% spending increase in Governor Murphy’s budget proposal is unsustainable going forward and proposed that school districts receiving large aid increases this year be required to store some funds in reserve to prevent property tax increases that may be triggered by future volatility in State aid and instability in municipal tax collections.

The full text of the letter follows:

Dear Governor Murphy:

Yesterday, you announced how you would allocate school funding that is increasing by $600 million in your proposed budget.  You announced increases of more than 10-20% for many districts and that reach as high as 58% in one district.  However, there are significant decreases or almost meaningless increases for many other districts struggling to meet pressures associated with COVID 19.   First and foremost, we believe that while schools are grappling with virtual education, technology costs, and planning for a safe return to our classrooms, no school should have its aid cut.   We will be recommending that change to your proposed budget, and in the course of budget hearings will identify savings to make this possible.  Second, we respectfully recommend that you instruct, through proposed budget language, that school districts being promised very large increases set aside at least half of the promised increase into uncommitted reserves to protect against two looming risks: (1) a repeat of last year’s fiasco where you directed school districts to pass budgets relying on unsustainable promised increases you later rescinded; and (2) municipal budget instability and residential property tax increases that will result when commercial and retail properties predictably and successfully appeal property values due to COVID 19 impacts.

Protecting Against a Repeat of Rescinding Unsustainable Promised Aid Increases

Last year, when similar unsustainable increases were announced as part of your proposed budget, your administration ordered school districts to prepare and pass budgets (well into the COVID 19 emergency) anticipating the promised increases. Budgets relying on your promises and order were passed — even as it became obvious to everyone that the promises were not sustainable.  After school budgets were enacted, you effectively pulled the rug out from under these schools by rescinding their promised aid increases.  This instability served no one.  Contracts, hiring decisions, and other spending obligations hardened and then promised aid was never delivered to support them.

This year seems likely to be more of the same, only worse. By way of example, last year you promised Plainfield and North Brunswick unsustainable increases of 13% and 26% that you later rescinded.  Now you are promising them even bigger and more unsustainable increases of 18% and 36%.  And Newark was promised an unsustainable increase of $53 million that you predictably never delivered and now you are promising them an even more unsustainable increase of more than $85 million.

The unsustainability of these sorts of increases is obvious.  You have proposed a State budget that increases overall spending by 11% — even as recurring revenues grow at a far less rate.  You readily admit that the 11% spending increase and up to 58% school aid increases are built on a one-time borrowing of $4.3 billion and related one-time use of surplus that will not be available in future years.   You have repeatedly stated that you believe the State’s finances to be volatile due to COVID 19.

Protecting Against Municipal Budget Instability and Residential Property Tax Increases

As is obvious to everyone, destructive impacts of COVID 19 will result in vacancies and financial distress for malls, office buildings, and retail centers.  In the near future, owners of these properties will be filing appeals, if they are able to pay their taxes at all.  Municipal budgets – despite being only a part of the recipient of property taxes – will be on the hook for these appeals.  The tax burdens once placed on office buildings and retail centers will shift to residential property owners while many of their incomes are stagnating.

Conditioning the largest increases on a prudent requirement to set aside a portion to share in the effort to address the impact of tax appeals will help stabilize municipal budget that will otherwise be left holding the bag.  And it will protect against a shift to residential property taxpayers to pick up the slack.

In the weeks to come, legislators in both parties will be discussing and advocating for proposals to change your school funding proposal so that districts losing aid are made whole during a period of unrest and uncertainty.  We will be discussing and advocating for proposals to more fairly allocate any increase in aid by focusing increases toward Extraordinary Special Education demands that remain underfunded.  And many legislators will be advocating that more funds be made available to people, small businesses, and nonprofits who continue to be crushed by COVID 19 and unreasonable closures and regulations with little more than lip service of financial help coming from Trenton.


Senator Steven V. Oroho
Republican Budget Officer

Senator Declan J. O’Scanlon, Jr.
Member, Budget Committee

Senator Michael L. Testa, Jr.
Member, Budget Committee

Senator Samuel D. Thompson
Member, Budget Committee


Sheila Oliver, Commissioner, Department of Community Affairs
Angelica Allen-McMillan, Acting Commissioner, Department of Education
Elizabeth Maher Muoio, Treasurer

Leave a Comment:

Comment Rules: Please remain civil, stay on topic, and refrain from using foul or abusive language. Posts that violate those rules may be hidden or deleted, and repeated violators may be blocked.

Republican Senators

Tom Kean

District 21 - Republican Leader

Kip Bateman

District 16

Chris Brown

District 2

Anthony M. Bucco

District 25

Chris Connors

District 9

Kristin Corrado

District 40

Michael Doherty

District 23

Jim Holzapfel

District 10

Steven Oroho

District 24

Declan O'Scanlon

District 13

Joe Pennacchio

District 26

Holly Schepisi

District 39

Robert Singer

District 30

Michael Testa

District 1

Samuel Thompson

District 12

Senate Republican Office

Contact Us

We Want to Hear from You!


Getting to the State House

Email Updates

Sign Up for Our Daily Update

Legislative Activity

Committees, Bills & Votes

NJ COVID-19 Information HUB
- Proudly Serving the People of New Jersey -